The British and the 1973 Greek republic referendum

Today marks the 40th anniversary of the 1973 Greek republic referendum.

In this excerpt from my book on Britain and the Colonels, you can see how journalist Mario Modiano, talking to British officials well before the referendum, predicted, with uncanny precision, the exact percentage of the people who would vote 'Yes' to the constitutional changes. 
The fact that both foreign journalists and the British Embassy could so easily provide a accurate estimate of the result well in advance speaks volumes about the genuineness of the referendum.

The last important event of [1973's] ‘pretty gruelling summer’, as far as the domestic scene of Greece was concerned, was the referendum on the amended Greek constitution.

 

The junta had warned the British that they should not judge the referendum by British standards and members of the international press had expressed the certainty that it would be ‘a farce’. Mario Modiano [...] thought that the decision to abolish the monarchy had been taken a long time ago, told the British that the Colonels would not permit a repeat of the results of the 1968 plebiscite, in order to make them appear genuine: ‘If as seems likely they fudged the figures, they were likely to choose a more plausible percentage (like for example 78%)’ (emphasis added).

 

This was also the opinion of some FCO officials who had realized, as early as in June 1973, that there was ‘little doubt as to the outcome of the referendum, although the government, who were believed to be embarrassed by the very high yes-votes in 1968, might prefer a rather smaller percentage in their favour this time’.

The British conceded that it was ‘very easy’ to predict the outcome of the referendum, with the Colonels still controlling the levers of power and not being able to afford to lose.

[...] As [British official J F R] Martin admitted shortly before the referendum, ‘few observers doubt that the figure has been decided in advance to within a few per cent’.

Polling took place on 29 July to approve the new republican constitution and the appointment of Papadopoulos as president (reserving for him exclusive powers over defence, foreign affairs and internal security) and Angelis as vice-president.

The final results showed that ‘yes’ got the 78.4% of the vote, which was considered ‘a respectable looking percentage’ in London.

The British embassy’s own estimate had been 78% (emphasis added).

The British, however, were in no doubt that there had been ‘a good deal of malpractice’, as they were aware that before the referendum the junta had ‘used all its very considerable influence to ensure the desired result’. 

They also did not fail to notice that ‘something perhaps ha[d] changed’, as the regime had been taken by surprise by the strength of feeling against it, and that could result in the toughening of its attitude to palliate the hardliners. 

The British representative concluded his report on the events by writing that ‘one [could] not have much confidence that Greece [was] yet firmly on the road leading back to anything that Western Europe would recognise as democracy’ [pp. 185-186].

The ghost of the Colonels by Adam Curtis

About a month ago, Adam Curtis (pictured) published this entry on his BBC blog.
It is an excellent piece and it connects the current financial situation of Greece with the
Greek Colonels' dictatorship.

Among the gems included are a really fascinating report by Panorama's John Morgan, and the film
Greece - The Seven Black Years, which manages to give a clear picture (and in colour!) of what life under the regime was like.
It is a remarkable film and a wonderful source for those interested in developing an in-depth understanding of the dictatorship.

'Back to the 1960s'

Another entry that is connected to the Greek debt crisis.

Yesterday, a Greek minister (by a strange twist of fate bearing the same name as the Greek dictator's brother and regime official) made a comparison between the current financial situation in Athens and the one around the time of the Greek Colonels' regime, and expressed the opinion that Greece's exit from the eurozone would lead the country 40 to 50 years back.

According to BBC News:

'Greece's minister for international economic relations, Constantine Papadopoulos, said leaving the euro would be "catastrophic" for Greece.

"I personally think [leaving the eurozone] would take us back to the 1960s or 1970s,"he told the BBC's Andrew Marr programme.

He later clarified that he was not referring to the political situation at the time, when the military took power in a coup, but the standards of living and the structure of the economy.'

Here's the full article.


And here you can see an interview he gave to SKY NEWS more recently:

Ioannidis, Cyprus, and the irony of history

Dimitrios Ioannidis, one of the instigators of the April 1967 coup that brought the Greek Colonels to power, died early in the morning today.
During the seven-year reign of the 'junta', Brigadier Ioannidis was director of the Greek military police (ΕΣΑ), and he was known as one of the hardliners of the regime.
He rose to prominence in November 1973, when he masterminded, behind the scenes, a new coup that put an end to the liberalising efforts initiated by Georgios Papadopoulos, under the so-called 'Markezinis experiment'.

History showed its ironic face once again, as the 'invisible dictator' (as he was known during 1973-4) passed away on the 50th anniversary of the independence of the Republic of Cyprus.
Ioannidis' fate was tied to the Mediterranean island.

The Cyprus issue, which eventually brought about the demise of the
military junta, was the most predominant foreign policy preoccupation of all the
dictators (and especially of Ioannidis) throughout their tenure of power, for they
thought that, as Coufoudakis has argued, ‘removing this irritant from Greek domestic and foreign policy and interallied
relations, was expected to increase the Colonels' prestige at home and end the
régime’s international isolation’.

The first signs appeared in the summer of 1970, when a crisis was brewing up on the island, also as a consequence of the attempted assassination of President Makarios earlier that year.
Papadopoulos' handling of the situation in Cyprus, in conjunction with
his initiatives in trying to mitigate foreign critics through
pursuing a conciliatory line precipitated cracks within the junta, which appeared
at that time to be far from united. The internal troubles peaked in the summer of 1970
when Papadopoulos (who was already both prime minister and minister of defence)
decided, following Pipinelis’ death, to assume the post of minister of foreign affairs,
as well. Jealously prevailed among Papadopoulos’ critics, with the concentration of
power in his hands being the real issue. The casualties of the acute internal crisis,
which was resolved in September, were the prime minister’s ability to confront the
hardliners and his supposed efforts towards the gradual democratisation of the
régime.

When, in November 1973, a coup overthrew Papadopoulos, the British were quick to identify Ioannidis as the ‘somewhat shadowy figure’ behind the new government.
As a consequence of developments in Greece, however, the British decided to adopt once more a
wait-and-see policy, with greater caution dictated by parliamentary attitudes that were
unfavourable to Ioannidis.

A few months later, and before celebrating fifteen years as an independent state, the Republic of Cyprus would cease to exist in its initial form.
The coup that the Greek junta, under Ioannidis, launched against Makarios triggered a invasion by Turkey, which still occupies the northern third of Cyprus today, thus dividing the island.

The actions of the dictator that precipitated the division of Cyprus came back to haunt him; according to the dictates of historical irony, the 16th of August will from now on mark both the beginning of the Republic of Cyprus and the end of the man who tried to dismantle it.

Photos taken from http://www.tovima.gr/ and http://www.windowoncyprus.com/.

Britain and the junta: 40 years ago II

Here's the article on Anglo-Greek relations in 1970, in English this time:

Britain and Greece: 40 years ago
By Alexandros Nafpliotis*

‘If a member of a club breaks the rules for a limited period, the other members may tolerate it but if he is in persistent violation of the rules, the time must come when the club can no longer accept the situation. My government, with great reluctance, has come to the conclusion that this is the situation we are faced with now’

George Thompson (Britain’s chief delegate to CoE), 11 December 1969

The timetable presented by a Greek minister failed to persuade European allies of the intentions of the Greek government. Western European governments are toughening their stance vis-à-vis Greece, which is now forced to look for support in other areas of the globe. The Greek prime minister, who has also taken over the post of minister of foreign affairs, is struggling to take the country out of the ‘vulnerable international position’ it is in, and which does not leave it much room for manoeuvre. In his effort to achieve this he encounters strong reactions from members of his government, who disagree with his initiatives in trying to mitigate foreign critics through pursuing a conciliatory line.

Meanwhile, Britain is preparing for a crucial election, which is very likely to reinstate the Conservatives to the leadership of the country after a long period of Labour dominance. It is considered certain that the Tories’ return to power will impact considerably on London’s relations with Brussels and other major European capitals. The leader of the party assumed the responsibility of dramatically changing the party’s profile and competing with the charismatic Labour leader five years ago.

All of the above refer to the situation in Athens and London not in 2010 but exactly 40 years ago. The third anniversary of the 21 April coup d’etat that brought the Colonels to power was overshadowed by the feeling of isolation that the regime was increasingly experiencing. This was mainly a consequence of Greece’s walkout (when it realised that expulsion was imminent) from the Council of Europe, the previous December. George Papadopoulos (prime minister, minister of defence, and, from the summer on, also minister of foreign affairs) launched the regime’s ‘opening into the East’, in order to enhance the international standing of Greece, which had taken some serious blows. The hardliners of the junta reacted to Papadopoulos’ concentration of powers, and to his handling of the situation in Cyprus. In the summer of 1970, Edward Heath completely unexpectedly became premier, as he led the Conservatives to one of the biggest electoral surprises in British history, and set Britain’s accession to the EEC as his primary goal.
The return of the Tories in power created great expectations on the part of the junta, mainly because of the lack of a left wing within the Conservative party and the great interest that the Tories traditionally show for matters of defence and security. The newspaper Nea Politia (the mouthpiece of the regime), immediately pointed out the importance of the electoral outcome, claiming that the British election results ‘show that the swing towards the left in Europe is being halted’ and that these developments ‘vindicate the 1967 Revolution and show that the Greek officers who launched it were the first to understand the message of [the] times’. This was followed by positive statements by British officials (stressing the fact that the Conservative party did not have a left wing) that contributed to an amelioration of relations. London, under tremendous pressure formed by its financial difficulties and US insistence, decided that it was necessary to have a ‘good working relationship’ with the Greek military regime that would allow Britain to actively promote trade (including arms sales) between the two countries.

The tension that was created in the Mediterranean in September 1970, strengthened Greece’s position, as it underlined its significance for the Atlantic Alliance and seemed to justify the British argument in favour of working closely with Athens and avoiding discussing the ‘Greek issue’ in NATO at all cost. The meeting that took place at Geoffrey Rippon’s office at the end of the month is quite indicative of the Heath government’s intentions. The record of this meeting epitomised British policy towards the Colonels under the Conservative party, as it provided a perfect illustration of the priorities of Whitehall, its position on a series of sensitive issues, and, finally, marked a watershed with regard to Anglo-Greek relations in some respects. It was decided that ‘co-operation with Greece in the military field was particularly important if we were to maintain a good working relationship with the Greek Government’ and it was stated that ‘HMG’s recent agreement to the supply of frigates should prove helpful in this connexion’. The new spirit in relations was further proven by Palamas’ (Greek alternate minister of foreign affairs) visit to the British capital and Sir Denis Greenhill’s (permanent under-secretary of state for foreign affairs) statement that his country wished to do ‘as much business as possible with Greece’, as well as by the Palamas –Douglas-Home meeting in New York in October.

Despite a relative fluctuation in relations between the two countries (that chiefly had to do with difficulties bequeathed by Wilson), the Heath government made clear its will to establish warmer relations, by drawing a distinction between its policy and that of its predecessor, and by using cooperation in the military field as the catalyst. 1970 is a milestone in Anglo-Greek relations as it is the starting-point of a Tory policy towards the Greek junta that, however, was to bear more fruit in the following years of their tenure. The prevalent aspect of this policy was the cynicism with which London and its representatives in Athens seemed to accept the situation in Greece. The following year, the British ambassador in Greece, Sir Robin Hooper sent a report to FCO stating this:

‘I do not see Greece returning to a democratic system of government as understood in Western European countries for many years and evolution even to a form of guided democracy such as the colonels have in the past seemed to envisage is evidently going to be slow and uncertain’.

*Alexandros Nafpliotis holds a PhD in International History from the London School of Economics and is currently writing a book on Britain and the Greek Colonels, 1967-1974.

Britain and the junta: 40 years ago

Here's an article (in Greek) on the similarities between the situation in Athens and London today, and back in 1970.

Χούντα και Βρετανία: 40 χρόνια πριν
του Αλέξανδρου Ναυπλιώτη*

«Αν κάποιο μέλος μιας ένωσης αψηφά τους κανόνες για μια περιορισμένη περίοδο τα άλλα μέλη μπορούν να το ανεχθούν· αν όμως παραβιάζει συνεχώς τους κανόνες, τότε πρέπει κάποια στιγμή να πάψει η ένωση να δέχεται αυτή την κατάσταση. Η κυβέρνησή μου, με μεγάλη απροθυμία, έφθασε στο συμπέρασμα πως τέτοια είναι η κατάσταση που αντιμετωπίζουμε τώρα».
George Thompson (Υπουργός άνευ χαρτοφυλακίου στην κυβέρνηση Wilson), 11 Δεκεμβρίου 1969

Το χρονοδιάγραμμα που παρουσίασε κορυφαίος υπουργός δεν κατάφερε να πείσει τους Ευρωπαίους εταίρους για τις προθέσεις της ελληνικής κυβέρνησης. Οι Δυτικοευρωπαϊκές κυβερνήσεις σκληραίνουν τη στάση τους απέναντι στην Ελλάδα, η οποία είναι αναγκασμένη πια να αναζητήσει ερείσματα σε άλλες περιοχές του πλανήτη. Ο Έλληνας πρωθυπουργός, έχοντας αναλάβει και καθήκοντα Υπουργού Εξωτερικών, προσπαθεί να βγάλει την χώρα από την «ευάλωτη διεθνώς θέση» στην οποία έχει περιέλθει και που δεν της αφήνει μεγάλο περιθώριο ελιγμών. Στην προσπάθειά του αυτή συναντά ισχυρές εσωτερικές αντιδράσεις από μέλη της κυβέρνησής του που δε συμφωνούν με τη συμβιβαστική γραμμή που φαίνεται να ακολουθεί ο πρωθυπουργός σε σχέση με τους ξένους επικριτές της Ελλάδας.
Το ίδιο διάστημα η Βρετανία ετοιμάζεται για μια κρίσιμη εκλογική αναμέτρηση που είναι πιθανόν να επαναφέρει στο τιμόνι της χώρας τους Συντηρητικούς ύστερα από μια μακρά περίοδο κυριαρχίας των Εργατικών. Θεωρείται βέβαιο ότι η επιστροφή των Τόρηδων στην εξουσία θα επηρεάσει σημαντικά τις σχέσεις του Λονδίνου με τις Βρυξέλλες και τις άλλες μεγάλες ευρωπαϊκές πρωτεύουσες. Ο αρχηγός του κόμματος εκλέχθηκε στην ηγεσία του κόμματος πριν από πέντε χρόνια σε μια προσπάθεια να αλλάξει ριζικά το προφίλ του και να συναγωνιστεί τον χαρισματικό ηγέτη των Εργατικών.

Τα παραπάνω αναφέρονται στην κατάσταση που επικρατούσε στην Αθήνα και το Λονδίνο όχι το 2010, αλλά ακριβώς 40 χρόνια πριν. Η τρίτη επέτειος του πραξικοπήματος της 21ης Απριλίου έβρισκε το καθεστώς απομονωμένο από τους Ευρωπαίους συμμάχους του λόγω της ουσιαστικής αποπομπής της Ελλάδας από το Συμβούλιο της Ευρώπης τον προηγούμενο Δεκέμβριο. Ο Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος, πρωθυπουργός, και υπουργός άμυνας και (από το καλοκαίρι και έπειτα και) εξωτερικών, προωθεί το («κυρίως επικοινωνιακό») «άνοιγμα προς Ανατολάς» και το «άνοιγμα προς την Αφρική» της χούντας, ώστε να βελτιώσει το διεθνές κύρος της χώρας που έχει πληγεί σημαντικά. Οι λεγόμενοι «σκληροί» του καθεστώτος (Ιωαννίδης, Λαδάς, Ασλανίδης) αντιδρούν στη συγκέντρωση εξουσιών στο πρόσωπο του Παπαδόπουλου, καθώς και στους χειρισμούς του τελευταίου σχετικά με την κρίση που παρουσιάζεται στις σχέσεις με τον Μακάριο και την απελευθέρωση κρατουμένων, η οποία πραγματοποιείται για να κατευνάσει πρωτίστως τους επικριτές που βρίσκονται στο εξωτερικό. Το καλοκαίρι του 1970, ο Edward Heath γίνεται τελείως ανέλπιστα πρωθυπουργός, έχοντας οδηγήσει τους Συντηρητικούς σε μια από τις μεγαλύτερες εκλογικές εκπλήξεις στην ιστορία της Βρετανίας, και θέτει ως πρωταρχικό του στόχο την είσοδο της χώρας στην Ευρωπαϊκή Οικονομική Κοινότητα.
Η επιστροφή των Τόρηδων στην εξουσία γεννάει μεγάλες προσδοκίες στην χούντα, λόγω της έλλειψης αριστερής πτέρυγας στο εσωτερικό του κόμματος και του μεγάλου ενδιαφέροντος που επιδεικνύουν παραδοσιακά οι Συντηρητικοί για θέματα ασφάλειας και άμυνας. Η Νέα Πολιτεία (όργανο του καθεστώτος) σπεύδει να επισημάνει τη σημασία του εκλογικού αποτελέσματος ως ενδεικτικού του γενικότερου φραγμού στην αριστερή στροφή στην Ευρώπη, και ως δικαίωσης της «Επανάστασης του 1967» που πρώτη συνέλαβε το μήνυμα της εποχής. Στην καλλιέργεια αυτού του κλίματος συντελούν και δηλώσεις Βρετανών αξιωματούχων πως «το γεγονός ότι δεν υπάρχει – ως συνέβαινε με Εργατικούς – αριστερά πτέρυξ δια να δημιουργή προβλήματα, δύναται να χαρακτηρισθή ως ευοίωνον σημείον». Το Λονδίνο, υπό την ασφυκτική πίεση των οικονομικών του δυσκολιών (αλλά και των ΗΠΑ), θεωρούσε ότι ήταν αναγκαία μια πολιτική καλών σχέσεων με το καθεστώς, η οποία θα καταστούσε δυνατή την εντατικοποίηση των εμπορικών συναλλαγών, συμπεριλαμβανομένης και της πώλησης πολεμικού υλικού.
Η ένταση που δημιουργήθηκε στην περιοχή της Μεσογείου τον Σεπτέμβριο του 1970, ισχυροποίησε τη θέση της χούντας, καθώς υπογράμμισε τη σημασία της για την Ατλαντική συμμαχία και φάνηκε να δικαιώνει το επιχείρημα των Βρετανών για στενότερη συνεργασία με την Αθήνα και την πάση θυσία αποφυγή συζήτησης του «ελληνικού ζητήματος» στο ΝΑΤΟ. Ενδεικτική των διαθέσεων της Συντηρητικής κυβέρνησης είναι η σύσκεψη που πραγματοποιήθηκε στα τέλη του μήνα υπό τον υπουργό που ήταν υπεύθυνος για τη διαδικασία εισόδου της Βρετανίας στην ΕΟΚ, Geoffrey Rippon. Εκεί αποφασίστηκε ότι η συνεργασία με την Ελλάδα στον στρατιωτικό τομέα ήταν «ιδιαιτέρως σημαντική» για τη διατήρηση καλών σχέσεων εργασίας με τη χούντα, και ειπώθηκε πως η πρόσφατη συμφωνία του Λονδίνου για την παροχή φρεγατών (και άλλου είδους υλικού για νατοϊκή, αποκλειστικά, χρήση) θα βοηθούσε σ’ αυτό. Το νέο πνεύμα στις ελληνοβρετανικές σχέσεις επισφραγίστηκε με την επίσκεψη του Αναπληρωτή ΥπΕξ Παλαμά στη βρετανική πρωτεύουσα και τη δήλωση του γενικού γραμματέα του Φόρεϊν Όφις, Greenhill ότι η χώρα του ήταν πρόθυμη για «όσο πιο πολύ εμπόριο» με την Ελλάδα, αλλά και με τη συνάντηση Παλαμά -Douglas-Home στη Νέα Υόρκη, τον Οκτώβριο.
Παρά μια σχετική διακύμανση στο επίπεδο των σχέσεων των δύο χωρών (που είχαν κυρίως να κάνουν με δυσκολίες που είχαν κληρονομήσει οι Συντηρητικοί από τη διακυβέρνηση Wilson), η κυβέρνηση Heath κατέστησε σαφείς τις προθέσεις της για θερμότερες σχέσεις με το καθεστώς, διαφοροποιώντας τη θέση της από τους Εργατικούς, και χρησιμοποιώντας ως καταλύτη τη συνεργασία στον αμυντικό τομέα. Τα γεγονότα του 1970 αποτέλεσαν την αφετηρία για την πολιτική των Τόρηδων απέναντι στην χούντα, η οποία είχε πιο ουσιαστικά αποτελέσματα τα επόμενα χρόνια της κοινής πορείας των δύο κυβερνήσεων. Χαρακτηριστικό αυτής της πολιτικής ήταν ο κυνισμός με τον οποίο δεχόταν το Λονδίνο και οι εκπρόσωποί του στην Ελλάδα την κατάσταση στην Αθήνα. Τον επόμενο χρόνο ο Βρετανός πρέσβης στην Ελλάδα Sir Robin Hooper έγραφε προς το Λονδίνο τα εξής:

«Δε βλέπω την Ελλάδα να επιστρέφει σε ένα δημοκρατικό σύστημα διακυβέρνησης όπως αυτό γίνεται αντιληπτό σε δυτικοευρωπαϊκές χώρες για πολλά χρόνια, και η εξέλιξη, ακόμη και με τη μορφή καθοδηγούμενης δημοκρατίας όπως αυτή που φαίνεται να οραματίζονταν οι συνταγματάρχες στο παρελθόν, θα είναι αποδεδειγμένα αργή και αβέβαιη».


*Ο Αλέξανδρος Ναυπλιώτης είναι διδάκτωρ διεθνούς ιστορίας του London School of Economics.

Papadopoulos and the British Parliament

In this 1994 article by Richard Clogg you can read how the leader of the Colonels' regime contributed towards cleaning up British political life, by giving 'a powerful boost to the process which culminated in the establishment in 1974 of the Register of Members' Interest'.

The 25 November 1973 coup d'etat

35 years ago yesterday another coup d'etat took place in Greece.
In the aftermath of the Athens Polytechnic uprising, head of the military police, Brigadier Dimitrios Ioannidis toppled Papadopoulos and installed Lieutenant General Phaedon Gizikis as President of Greece.
Ioannidis came to be known as the 'invisible dictator' because he was the one pulling the strings during the last period of the Colonels' regime which ended with the Cyprus coup d'etat in July 1974 and the Turkish invasion of the island.

Dimitrios Ioannides (right) toasting with George Papadopoulos (middle) and Phaedon Gizikis (left) Ioannides and Gizikis overthrew Papadopoulos in a later coup.

The communique announcing the overthrow of the Markezinis government accused Papadopoulos of 'straying from the ideals of the 1967 revolution and 'pushing the country towards parliamentary rule too quickly'.

Here you can read BBC's report on these events.

The photos on the right are from an article of the London press on the British recognition of Ioannides' regime.

[You can also read an article (in Greek) on Ioannidis, Kissinger and the USA here.]

The Economist

This is the Economist
building, at the Economist Plaza.

A plethora of articles of this publication referred to the Greek Colonels' regime and some on relations between London and Athens during the Seven Years.







Here's Papadopoulos' obituary that appeared in The Economist.